GROWING A LITTLE THINNER

GROWING A LITTLE THINNER

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SADDENED and ENLIGHTENED

Five of my   level one  circle of friends, all in their mid to late sixties, and all men, are in various stages of dementia.  I am told that three are handling  the diagnosis with equanimity, while two others seem to be in various sages of denial. Why this scourge at such an early age? Or has it always been thus, and my own advancing age has just made me more aware?   I am frightened for my friends, and to be really honest, even more frightened for myself. I think I could cope albeit reluctantly with the limitations that come with physical infirmity, but the thought of mental impairment is terrifying. After all, I am a Triple A North American Boomer with none of the innate  resignation present in more spiritually mature cultures.   I do have my share of Catholic superstition and mythology , and when push comes to shove , I revert to a very simple faith stance, but I do not have that any of that sense of the cycle of life so obvious in Hinduism, and I regret that I don’t.  I just keep on keeping on as if it and I will go on forever. How stupid of me; who ever said I was intelligent?

Of late I have developed an  interest in those two 16 th century mystics Theresa  of Avilla and John of the Cross.  Both come from families of `Conversos`, Spaniards who converted from Judaism under threat. I am reflecting  on  the influence of the   Kabbala on Christian mysticism, and am as always so appreciative and grateful for   our Jewish roots.   We still have much to learn from Rabbinic Judaism. One’s father remains one’s father even after one becomes an adult, and as all of know, there is much to be learned from our fathers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

KINDNESS

JULY 31, 2013, 2:44 PM

George Saunders’s Advice to Graduates

It’s long past graduation season, but we recently learned that George Saunders delivered the convocation speech at Syracuse University for the class of 2013, and George was kind enough to send it our way and allow us to reprint it here. The speech touches on some of the moments in his life and larger themes (in his life and work) that George spoke about in the profile we ran back in January— the need for kindness and all the things working against our actually achieving it, the risk in focusing too much on “success,” the trouble with swimming in a river full of monkey feces.

The entire speech, graduation season or not, is well worth reading, and is included below.

Down through the ages, a traditional form has evolved for this type of speech, which is: Some old fart, his best years behind him, who, over the course of his life, has made a series of dreadful mistakes (that would be me), gives heartfelt advice to a group of shining, energetic young people, with all of their best years ahead of them (that would be you).

And I intend to respect that tradition.

Now, one useful thing you can do with an old person, in addition to borrowing money from them, or asking them to do one of their old-time “dances,” so you can watch, while laughing, is ask: “Looking back, what do you regret?”  And they’ll tell you.  Sometimes, as you know, they’ll tell you even if you haven’t asked.  Sometimes, even when you’ve specifically requested they not tell you, they’ll tell you.

So: What do I regret?  Being poor from time to time?  Not really.  Working terrible jobs, like “knuckle-puller in a slaughterhouse?”  (And don’t even ASK what that entails.)  No.  I don’t regret that.  Skinny-dipping in a river in Sumatra, a little buzzed, and looking up and seeing like 300 monkeys sitting on a pipeline, pooping down into the river, the river in which I was swimming, with my mouth open, naked?  And getting deathly ill afterwards, and staying sick for the next seven months?  Not so much.  Do I regret the occasional humiliation?  Like once, playing hockey in front of a big crowd, including this girl I really liked, I somehow managed, while falling and emitting this weird whooping noise, to score on my own goalie, while also sending my stick flying into the crowd, nearly hitting that girl?  No.  I don’t even regret that.

But here’s something I do regret:

In seventh grade, this new kid joined our class.  In the interest of confidentiality, her Convocation Speech name will be “ELLEN.”  ELLEN was small, shy.  She wore these blue cat’s-eye glasses that, at the time, only old ladies wore.  When nervous, which was pretty much always, she had a habit of taking a strand of hair into her mouth and chewing on it.

So she came to our school and our neighborhood, and was mostly ignored, occasionally teased (“Your hair taste good?” – that sort of thing).  I could see this hurt her.  I still remember the way she’d look after such an insult: eyes cast down, a little gut-kicked, as if, having just been reminded of her place in things, she was trying, as much as possible, to disappear.  After awhile she’d drift away, hair-strand still in her mouth.  At home, I imagined, after school, her mother would say, you know: “How was your day, sweetie?” and she’d say, “Oh, fine.”  And her mother would say, “Making any friends?” and she’d go, “Sure, lots.”

Sometimes I’d see her hanging around alone in her front yard, as if afraid to leave it.

And then – they moved.  That was it.  No tragedy, no big final hazing.

One day she was there, next day she wasn’t.

End of story.

Now, why do I regret that?  Why, forty-two years later, am I still thinking about it?  Relative to most of the other kids, I was actually pretty nice to her.  I never said an unkind word to her.  In fact, I sometimes even (mildly) defended her.

But still.  It bothers me.

So here’s something I know to be true, although it’s a little corny, and I don’t quite know what to do with it:

What I regret most in my life are failures of kindness. 

Those moments when another human being was there, in front of me, suffering, and I responded…sensibly.  Reservedly.  Mildly.

Or, to look at it from the other end of the telescope:  Who, in your life, do you remember most fondly, with the most undeniable feelings of warmth?

Those who were kindest to you, I bet.

It’s a little facile, maybe, and certainly hard to implement, but I’d say, as a goal in life, you could do worse than: Try to be kinder.

Now, the million-dollar question:  What’s our problem?  Why aren’t we kinder?

Here’s what I think:

Each of us is born with a series of built-in confusions that are probably somehow Darwinian.  These are: (1) we’re central to the universe (that is, our personal story is the main and most interesting story, the only story, really); (2) we’re separate from the universe (there’s US and then, out there, all that other junk – dogs and swing-sets, and the State of Nebraska and low-hanging clouds and, you know, other people), and (3) we’re permanent (death is real, o.k., sure – for you, but not for me).

Now, we don’t really believe these things – intellectually we know better – but we believe them viscerally, and live by them, and they cause us to prioritize our own needs over the needs of others, even though what we really want, in our hearts, is to be less selfish, more aware of what’s actually happening in the present moment, more open, and more loving.

So, the second million-dollar question:  How might we DO this?  How might we become more loving, more open, less selfish, more present, less delusional, etc., etc?

Well, yes, good question.

Unfortunately, I only have three minutes left.

So let me just say this.  There are ways.  You already know that because, in your life, there have been High Kindness periods and Low Kindness periods, and you know what inclined you toward the former and away from the latter.  Education is good; immersing ourselves in a work of art: good; prayer is good; meditation’s good; a frank talk with a dear friend;  establishing ourselves in some kind of spiritual tradition – recognizing that there have been countless really smart people before us who have asked these same questions and left behind answers for us.

Because kindness, it turns out, is hard – it starts out all rainbows and puppy dogs, and expands to include…well, everything.

One thing in our favor:  some of this “becoming kinder” happens naturally, with age.  It might be a simple matter of attrition:  as we get older, we come to see how useless it is to be selfish – how illogical, really.  We come to love other people and are thereby counter-instructed in our own centrality.  We get our butts kicked by real life, and people come to our defense, and help us, and we learn that we’re not separate, and don’t want to be.  We see people near and dear to us dropping away, and are gradually convinced that maybe we too will drop away (someday, a long time from now).  Most people, as they age, become less selfish and more loving.  I think this is true.  The great Syracuse poet, Hayden Carruth, said, in a poem written near the end of his life, that he was “mostly Love, now.”

And so, a prediction, and my heartfelt wish for you: as you get older, your self will diminish and you will grow in love.  YOU will gradually be replaced by LOVE.   If you have kids, that will be a huge moment in your process of self-diminishment.  You really won’t care what happens to YOU, as long as they benefit.  That’s one reason your parents are so proud and happy today.  One of their fondest dreams has come true: you have accomplished something difficult and tangible that has enlarged you as a person and will make your life better, from here on in, forever.

Congratulations, by the way.

When young, we’re anxious – understandably – to find out if we’ve got what it takes.  Can we succeed?  Can we build a viable life for ourselves?  But you – in particular you, of this generation – may have noticed a certain cyclical quality to ambition.  You do well in high-school, in hopes of getting into a good college, so you can do well in the good college, in the hopes of getting a good job, so you can do well in the good job so you can….

And this is actually O.K.  If we’re going to become kinder, that process has to include taking ourselves seriously – as doers, as accomplishers, as dreamers.  We have to do that, to be our best selves.

Still, accomplishment is unreliable.  “Succeeding,” whatever that might mean to you, is hard, and the need to do so constantly renews itself (success is like a mountain that keeps growing ahead of you as you hike it), and there’s the very real danger that “succeeding” will take up your whole life, while the big questions go untended.

So, quick, end-of-speech advice: Since, according to me, your life is going to be a gradual process of becoming kinder and more loving: Hurry up.  Speed it along.  Start right now.  There’s a confusion in each of us, a sickness, really: selfishness.  But there’s also a cure.  So be a good and proactive and even somewhat desperate patient on your own behalf – seek out the most efficacious anti-selfishness medicines, energetically, for the rest of your life.

Do all the other things, the ambitious things – travel, get rich, get famous, innovate, lead, fall in love, make and lose fortunes, swim naked in wild jungle rivers (after first having it tested for monkey poop) – but as you do, to the extent that you can, err in the direction of kindness.  Do those things that incline you toward the big questions, and avoid the things that would reduce you and make you trivial.  That luminous part of you that exists beyond personality – your soul, if you will – is as bright and shining as any that has ever been.  Bright as Shakespeare’s, bright as Gandhi’s, bright as Mother Teresa’s.  Clear away everything that keeps you separate from this secret luminous place.  Believe it exists, come to know it better, nurture it, share its fruits tirelessly.

And someday, in 80 years, when you’re 100, and I’m 134, and we’re both so kind and loving we’re nearly unbearable, drop me a line, let me know how your life has been.  I hope you will say: It has been so wonderful.

Congratulations, Class of 2013.

I wish you great happiness, all the luck in the world, and a beautiful summer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dreaming About a June Wedding

It was a sultry day, more grey than yellow, the Bride was an ex-patriot Brit, her father an old friend of mine  from Cambridge University and before that Durham in the UK , over for the occasion; and the bride,  a Cambridge Rowing Blue; a 6’2” inch beauty, and an Olympic finalist, now an International Banker working with BNS here in Toronto. The groom was a second generation Toronto Italian, a C.A, graduate of the old Jesuit School Brebeuf College, and a very bright, kind and gentle man.  I wish them ‘ad multos annos’.  They asked me to speak, and I hope I did them proud.

Italian weddings go very very long, and this  was no exception. They begin at noon and end in the wee hours of the morning. First there is pre-Service, then there is Mass, then a mid-afternoon lubricant which the Bride insisted on being called ‘Tea’, and then off to a multi course dinner, gifts for everyone who attends, singing, dancing,  money aplenty for the couple, and lots of expressive affectivity. Everyone gets kissed three times by everyone else. Poor Brenda she has never gotten used to Italian ways, and I saw her wince more than once when one of the old men insisted on his three cheeks. For my part I am used to being kissed by men after all these years, and my close Italian friends like Rocco Rossi  kiss me whenever we meet, and I kiss back. It just seems natural, after all I used to kiss my Dad.  Alas, the visitors from the UK did their best, but were really not that comfortable. I laughed endless at my friend the Father of the Bride, who did his best to put on a brave face but by the end was kissed out.  All in all it was a wonderful day and saw the melding of two very different cultures. Pictures speak a thousand words and the dress of the two families summed it all up. There was the Mother of the Bride, decked out in sensible English and wearing the traditional hat, as did various other women from the UK.  The right side of the aisle saw men decked out in tight pants and gold chains, with only the occasional tie and lots and lots of  chest hair on display like it was today’s cod piece.  I exaggerate of course, but not too much. The bride and groom drove off in a London Taxi, to the chagrin of the Italians who kept wondering when the stretch Limo was going to appear.  Weddings and baptisms are left overs of the ancient fertility cults for many people from southern Europe. They do it differently than anything we do in the Anglo world. My youngest is going to a friend’s wedding a few weeks, and he tells me the wedding is already costing over $125k.   Baptisms are celebrated equally, with the baby lying in an elevated pram in front of the head table, and money gifts  of many hundreds of dollars expected, along with a fancy gift. Then again, they serve a 15 course dinner, dance and then also send you home with a gift. It really is “All together grand’.

Now to what I wanted to write about. The priest who presided over the Wedding Ceremony did a fine job with what he had to work with. But he came out with something that I  consider totally uncharitable and outrageous, and I recoiled.   He announced that those present who were not Catholic could not receive Communion. My inclination was to stand up and protest. Firstly those present with no belief were not likely to partake anyway, and those Anglicans, United Church People, Presbyterians  and others who believe in the Eucharist and the Lords Supper were denied. It is like asking people to dinner and then telling them not to eat the main course. Why the fuss?  Most Christians believe that Christ is somehow present in the Eucharist. They differ only in how they explain it philosophically. Catholics explain it by transubstantiation, in with and under the appearances of bread and wine, Lutherans  by consubstantiation,  present along with the bread and wine, Calvinists say that Christ is ‘virtually’ present in the bread and wine.   SO WHAT?  None of us are cannibals, we don’t believe we are eating flesh and drinking blood. The sacrament is a symbol but a symbol with a reality, not just an empty sign, but it is open to all.  Many members of Toronto’s Oxford and Cambridge Society were present yesterday, and most of them who are Christian are not Catholic. I WAS ABSOLUTELY DELIGHTED TO SEE THEM IGNORE THE narrow minded LITTLE PRIEST WHO MEANT WELL, AND PARTAKE IN THE BANQUET TO WHICH THEY WERE INVITED. To the uber orthodox mong you, think not of PJ Skinner, but ask what Jesus Christ would do?

The priest cast a negative shadow on yesterday celebration. But then what is new?  I want to believe that the Church just has to catch up to where God is.  I say that openly about gay marriage and inter faith communion as I do about many many other things.  Words about faith and social justice have little meaning when they  isolate and cast asunder so many of Gods children. Lets take a look at what’s in our own eyes, and focus on money laundering inside the Vatican Bank, and less about human sexuality and who takes communion.

Posted on by whispersfrombabylon | Leave a comment

Chairman Ben S. Bernanke

At the Baccalaureate Ceremony at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

June 2, 2013

The Ten Suggestions

 

View Video Leaving the Board

It’s nice to be back at Princeton. I find it difficult to believe that it’s been almost 11 years since I departed these halls for Washington. I wrote recently to inquire about the status of my leave from the university, and the letter I got back began, “Regrettably, Princeton receives many more qualified applicants for faculty positions than we can accommodate.”1 

I’ll extend my best wishes to the seniors later, but first I want to congratulate the parents and families here. As a parent myself, I know that putting your kid through college these days is no walk in the park. Some years ago I had a colleague who sent three kids through Princeton even though neither he nor his wife attended this university. He and his spouse were very proud of that accomplishment, as they should have been. But my colleague also used to say that, from a financial perspective, the experience was like buying a new Cadillac every year and then driving it off a cliff. I should say that he always added that he would do it all over again in a minute. So, well done, moms, dads, and families.

This is indeed an impressive and appropriate setting for a commencement. I am sure that, from this lectern, any number of distinguished spiritual leaders have ruminated on the lessons of the Ten Commandments. I don’t have that kind of confidence, and, anyway, coveting your neighbor’s ox or donkey is not the problem it used to be, so I thought I would use my few minutes today to make Ten Suggestions, or maybe just Ten Observations, about the world and your lives after Princeton. Please note, these points have nothing whatsoever to do with interest rates. My qualification for making such suggestions, or observations, besides having kindly been invited to speak today by President Tilghman, is the same as the reason that your obnoxious brother or sister got to go to bed later–I am older than you. All of what follows has been road-tested in real-life situations, but past performance is no guarantee of future results.

1. The poet Robert Burns once said something about the best-laid plans of mice and men ganging aft agley, whatever “agley” means. A more contemporary philosopher, Forrest Gump, said something similar about life and boxes of chocolates and not knowing what you are going to get. They were both right. Life is amazingly unpredictable; any 22-year-old who thinks he or she knows where they will be in 10 years, much less in 30, is simply lacking imagination. Look what happened to me: A dozen years ago I was minding my own business teaching Economics 101 in Alexander Hall and trying to think of good excuses for avoiding faculty meetings. Then I got a phone call . . . In case you are skeptical of Forrest Gump’s insight, here’s a concrete suggestion for each of the graduating seniors. Take a few minutes the first chance you get and talk to an alum participating in his or her 25th, or 30th, or 40th reunion–you know, somebody who was near the front of the P-rade. Ask them, back when they were graduating 25, 30, or 40 years ago, where they expected to be today. If you can get them to open up, they will tell you that today they are happy and satisfied in various measures, or not, and their personal stories will be filled with highs and lows and in-betweens. But, I am willing to bet, those life stories will in almost all cases be quite different, in large and small ways, from what they expected when they started out. This is a good thing, not a bad thing; who wants to know the end of a story that’s only in its early chapters? Don’t be afraid to let the drama play out.

2. Does the fact that our lives are so influenced by chance and seemingly small decisions and actions mean that there is no point to planning, to striving? Not at all. Whatever life may have in store for you, each of you has a grand, lifelong project, and that is the development of yourself as a human being. Your family and friends and your time at Princeton have given you a good start. What will you do with it? Will you keep learning and thinking hard and critically about the most important questions? Will you become an emotionally stronger person, more generous, more loving, more ethical? Will you involve yourself actively and constructively in the world? Many things will happen in your lives, pleasant and not so pleasant, but, paraphrasing a Woodrow Wilson School adage from the time I was here, “Wherever you go, there you are.” If you are not happy with yourself, even the loftiest achievements won’t bring you much satisfaction.

3. The concept of success leads me to consider so-called meritocracies and their implications. We have been taught that meritocratic institutions and societies are fair. Putting aside the reality that no system, including our own, is really entirely meritocratic, meritocracies may be fairer and more efficient than some alternatives. But fair in an absolute sense? Think about it. A meritocracy is a system in which the people who are the luckiest in their health and genetic endowment; luckiest in terms of family support, encouragement, and, probably, income; luckiest in their educational and career opportunities; and luckiest in so many other ways difficult to enumerate–these are the folks who reap the largest rewards. The only way for even a putative meritocracy to hope to pass ethical muster, to be considered fair, is if those who are the luckiest in all of those respects also have the greatest responsibility to work hard, to contribute to the betterment of the world, and to share their luck with others. As the Gospel of Luke says (and I am sure my rabbi will forgive me for quoting the New Testament in a good cause): “From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded” (Luke 12:48, New Revised Standard Version Bible). Kind of grading on the curve, you might say.

4. Who is worthy of admiration? The admonition from Luke–which is shared by most ethical and philosophical traditions, by the way–helps with this question as well. Those most worthy of admiration are those who have made the best use of their advantages or, alternatively, coped most courageously with their adversities. I think most of us would agree that people who have, say, little formal schooling but labor honestly and diligently to help feed, clothe, and educate their families are deserving of greater respect–and help, if necessary–than many people who are superficially more successful. They’re more fun to have a beer with, too. That’s all that I know about sociology.

5. Since I have covered what I know about sociology, I might as well say something about political science as well. In regard to politics, I have always liked Lily Tomlin’s line, in paraphrase: “I try to be cynical, but I just can’t keep up.” We all feel that way sometime. Actually, having been in Washington now for almost 11 years, as I mentioned, I feel that way quite a bit. Ultimately, though, cynicism is a poor substitute for critical thought and constructive action. Sure, interests and money and ideology all matter, as you learned in political science. But my experience is that most of our politicians and policymakers are trying to do the right thing, according to their own views and consciences, most of the time. If you think that the bad or indifferent results that too often come out of Washington are due to base motives and bad intentions, you are giving politicians and policymakers way too much credit for being effective. Honest error in the face of complex and possibly intractable problems is a far more important source of bad results than are bad motives. For these reasons, the greatest forces in Washington are ideas, and people prepared to act on those ideas. Public service isn’t easy. But, in the end, if you are inclined in that direction, it is a worthy and challenging pursuit.

6. Having taken a stab at sociology and political science, let me wrap up economics while I’m at it. Economics is a highly sophisticated field of thought that is superb at explaining to policymakers precisely why the choices they made in the past were wrong. About the future, not so much. However, careful economic analysis does have one important benefit, which is that it can help kill ideas that are completely logically inconsistent or wildly at variance with the data. This insight covers at least 90 percent of proposed economic policies.

7. I’m not going to tell you that money doesn’t matter, because you wouldn’t believe me anyway. In fact, for too many people around the world, money is literally a life-or-death proposition. But if you are part of the lucky minority with the ability to choose, remember that money is a means, not an end. A career decision based only on money and not on love of the work or a desire to make a difference is a recipe for unhappiness.

8. Nobody likes to fail but failure is an essential part of life and of learning. If your uniform isn’t dirty, you haven’t been in the game.

9. I spoke earlier about definitions of personal success in an unpredictable world. I hope that as you develop your own definition of success, you will be able to do so, if you wish, with a close companion on your journey. In making that choice, remember that physical beauty is evolution’s way of assuring us that the other person doesn’t have too many intestinal parasites. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for beauty, romance, and sexual attraction–where would Hollywood and Madison Avenue be without them? But while important, those are not the only things to look for in a partner. The two of you will have a long trip together, I hope, and you will need each other’s support and sympathy more times than you can count. Speaking as somebody who has been happily married for 35 years, I can’t imagine any choice more consequential for a lifelong journey than the choice of a traveling companion.

10. Call your mom and dad once in a while. A time will come when you will want your own grown-up, busy, hyper-successful children to call you. Also, remember who paid your tuition to Princeton.

Those are my suggestions. They’re probably worth exactly what you paid for them. But they come from someone who shares your affection for this great institution and who wishes you the best for the future.

Congratulations, graduates. Give ’em hell.

 

 PRINCETON COMMENCEMENT-GENTLE BEN

Posted on by whispersfrombabylon | Leave a comment

By Jon Hilsenrath

Everyone wants to psychoanalyze Ben Bernanke these days. Does he want another term as chairman of the Federal Reserve? Is he preparing to walk off into the sunset when his current term ends next January? What is his secret motive for skipping the Fed’s annual retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming this year?

Associated Press
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke leads the processional out of Princeton University Chapel after giving a commencement address there Sunday.

In that vein, his unusually personal and wistful commencement address atPrinceton University Sunday afternoon is sure to be closely scrutinized for hidden meaning. But let’s leave the psychobabble to unqualified bond traders and take the speech for what it is: His best graduation address as a public official.

Mr. Bernanke — a former Princeton economics professor — has delivered his share of clunkers before, such as a 2008 address to Harvard students about inflation, which was panned in the Harvard Crimson.

Others have been thoughtful but wound up rather dry, such as a recent talk on innovation and the economy’s long-run growth prospects at Bard College at Simon Rock.

This one clearly came from his gut. It put on display Ben Bernanke as comedian

“The poet Robert Burns once said something about the best-laid plans of mice and men ganging aft agley, whatever “agley” means.”

.. includes some touching personal reflections…

“I hope that as you develop your own definition of success, you will be able to do so, if you wish, with a close companion on your journey…the two of you will have a long trip together, I hope, and you will need each other’s support and sympathy more times than you can count. Speaking as somebody who has been happily married for 35 years, I can’t imagine any choice more consequential for a lifelong journey than the choice of a traveling companion.”

… thoughtful insight into how Washington works …

“I have always liked Lily Tomlin’s line, in paraphrase: “I try to be cynical, but I just can’t keep up.” We all feel that way sometime. Actually, having been in Washington now for almost 11 years, as I mentioned, I feel that way quite a bit. Ultimately, though, cynicism is a poor substitute for critical thought and constructive action. Sure, interests and money and ideology all matter, as you learned in political science. But my experience is that most of our politicians and policymakers are trying to do the right thing, according to their own views and consciences, most of the time. If you think that the bad or indifferent results that too often come out of Washington are due to base motives and bad intentions, you are giving politicians and policymakers way too much credit for being effective.”

… an honest assessment of the state of his own field …

“Economics is a highly sophisticated field of thought that is superb at explaining to policymakers precisely why the choices they made in the past were wrong. About the future, not so much. However, careful economic analysis does have one important benefit, which is that it can help kill ideas that are completely logically inconsistent or wildly at variance with the data. This insight covers at least 90 percent of proposed economic policies.”

… advice that every college graduate needs …

“Nobody likes to fail but failure is an essential part of life and of learning. If your uniform isn’t dirty, you haven’t been in the game.”

…and this bit that will warm any parent’s heart …

“Call your mom and dad once in a while. A time will come when you will want your own grown-up, busy, hyper-successful children to call you. Also, remember who paid your tuition.”

As far as his plans for the future, the Journal has reported on a number of occasions that his friends and former colleagues believe he doesn’t want another term.

Posted on by whispersfrombabylon | Leave a comment

APRIL FOOLISHNESS

Wednesday, 03 April 2013 

 

Yesterday I sat for what seemed like forever in the outer office of my latest medical referral. I was there to see Nephrologist Perkins, a young South African about the age of my oldest son, Jonathan. While waiting I returned a call to Kevin Breen, part of the Newfoundland exilic contingent now winding its way to Florida.  I am not a lover of Florida, I  prefer California and Hawaii, but I was distinctively green on listening to Kevin’s plans.  However the real truth is that I am  green because I am so obsessed and unbalanced that I end up vacationing very little. Not for me hikes with John Breen, golfing with Terry Stack and others, playing cards with Brian Shorthall, the best I manage these days  is an escape to Muskoka, and it is Brenda who tours the world with Moya Greene and her sister Joan. What do I do, well I work, or at least play at it, and when I am not working, I study, or at least that’s the way if often seems.   I confess to having a genetic abnormality, and when I acknowledge it openly, Brenda comments, you know of course that you  have more than one? 

I was irritated that Nephrologist Perkins kept me waiting for as long as he did yesterday, but I behaved, and did not turn obnoxious.  When I finally saw him, it was well worth the wait.  He talked to me for about two hours, comprehensively reviewed and explained my blood chemistry  and the interaction of my multiple ailments and their medications.   It was one of the most through explanations I have ever been given, and helped me to finally understand the causality and continuing  impact of my near death episode in the late fall.  Rest assured I am ok, for my age and what I have been through, and that is the truth.  Then, you may wonder, why talk about it at all?

All of you know I have been openly reflective and critical about self-abuse, the type of thing that brings you to an early death. I wrote a lot about James Mary. Yesterday I came away being forced to recognize my own self-abuse, and how in the end it does catch up. I drink little and smoked but for a brief moment many years ago, but my unbalanced life style, my eating habits, my lack of proper exercise, have all taken their toll in time. I came away depressed yesterday because I can’t fix I what I have done, I can’t turn back the clock, some things are not repairable.   In retrospect, how stupid I was on my prostate issue!  I paid no attention to obvious symptoms, and kept endlessly pissing in ignorance that there might be something amiss. I ignored my hips until I could no longer walk, and now with two artificial hips I look back and wonder why I waited so long because now I can enjoy a simple walk once again. In sum, I am one of those fellows who needs to have someone take a two by four and hit him in the head a few times to wake up. How is it that  such a bright fellow can be so dumb? I now have two kidney stones to take out, and I have promised myself  not to put it off, if I do feel free to take a four by six and hit me in the head a few times.

 

I am never depressed and down for long, but I do go there from time to time. My Black Dog immobilizes me, and I go catatonic and quiet, [can you even imagine that?]  Shopping for gadgets helps, and my family always cautions that its ok to buy a fancy fountain pen, but please don’t come home with a new Rolls Royce.   I have an idea, I will unwrap my Phantom  and take off its winter blanket, that always gives me a gig.

I also want to walk the Camino!

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Easter 2013

“Distracted from distraction by distraction” is how T.S.Eliot described us sojourners in our now face-booked and twittered universe. In fact his words are more true today than when he wrote them in The Four Quartets.  We live with the rain, drizzle and fog of media saturation, and it is not always easy to recognize gossip from news,  and both from what is real and true  . Indeed it is quite possible to become permanently lost in a  noise filled  distraction where there is never any  quiet.

Easter is a tale of sacrifice, torture, abandonment and death; and thence a sacramental quantum leap to a triumph over death. Unlike Christmas there is not a lot of commercial play at this time of year, and neither bunnies nor chocolate are sufficient to take us away from the stark fundamentals of remembrance.. It is Easter which makes Christianity radically different. In a world where we worship strength and power, It is a story of a man on the cross, despised, defeated and rejected who  ultimately defeats what all of us  fear the most, death. If you  believe, it is the most important event that ever happened or ever will.  If you do not, it is all absurd and little more than mythological garbage.  In fact I have met some cynics who maintain that the bones of Jesus are really  hidden away in the Segretum Archivum Vaticanum. For me, Easter is a time to think about deeper and more profound realities, of transcendental themes,  beginning with the stone rolled back and the empty tomb..Because I enjoy the gift of faith which accompanies my never-ending doubt,  I have hope in the face of my unbelief.

I cannot end without some reference to the new occupant of the Chair of Peter. While I applaud his focus on poverty and simplicity, I choose not to ignore his position on our gay brothers and sisters, on the status  and equality of women,  on their right to celebrate  the Christian mysteries, on the lack of  respect for basic civil and human rights inside the institutional Church.  If we do not stand with women, the gay community,   and other marginalized people, we are really not standing with the poor. 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WHAT I BELIEVE

I don’t drink the Cool Aid, and never have. In recent days I have received a series of emails from old friends in Rome about the passing parade inside the Vatican, and could not help but draw comparisons to  the mind-set that was Jim Jones and Jones Town.  The triumphalistic fantasy world some good friends still trumpet never ceases to astound me.  So much of it is romantic fantasy wilfully blind to dysfunction and corruption. How long before the Wall falls, and that indeed is a good comparison. Remember 1989 and how it all just seemed to happen and who among us had any idea it would crumble as quickly as it did?   I do not mean to offend the uber orthodox among you, so please understand that it is not the Church of Jesus the Christ that I reference, but that absolute monarchical structure introduced by Pope Gregory VII many hundreds of years ago, a structure that did not exist in the first 1000 years of Christianity.   I am one of those “Bad Weeds’ who thinks it is high time that we move beyond Downton Abbey.

I enclose a recent New York Times article by Hans Kung, one of the pre-eminent religious scholars in the world, and the man who helped the emeritus Benedict obtain his original position at Tubingen University. Alas Benedict returned the favour by not allowing Kung to teach Theology. I have already earlier referenced how much I treasure Kung, and how I sometimes wish I had accepted his invitation and acceptance to do doctoral work under his tutelage.  So, I am biased and declare it openly.

Do take a moment and read what Hans Kung writes. His scholarship is beyond repute and his history accurate.

From The New York Times:

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR: A Vatican Spring?

How to save the church.

http://nyti.ms/VbltFP

A Vatican Spring?

THE Arab Spring has shaken a whole series of autocratic regimes. With the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, might not something like that be possible in the Roman Catholic Church as well — a Vatican Spring?

Of course, the system of the Catholic Church doesn’t resemble Tunisia or Egypt so much as an absolute monarchy like Saudi Arabia. In both places there are no genuine reforms, just minor concessions. In both, tradition is invoked to oppose reform. In Saudi Arabia tradition goes back only two centuries; in the case of the papacy, 20 centuries.

Yet is that tradition true? In fact, the church got along for a millennium without a monarchist-absolutist papacy of the kind we’re familiar with today.

It was not until the 11th century that a “revolution from above,” the “Gregorian Reform” started by Pope Gregory VII, left us with the three enduring features of the Roman system: a centralist-absolutist papacy, compulsory clericalism and the obligation of celibacy for priests and other secular clergy.

The efforts of the reform councils in the 15th century, the reformers in the 16th century, the Enlightenment and the French Revolution in the 17th and 18th centuries and the liberalism of the 19th century met with only partial success. Even the Second Vatican Council, from 1962 to 1965, while addressing many concerns of the reformers and modern critics, was thwarted by the power of the Curia, the church’s governing body, and managed to implement only some of the demanded changes.

To this day the Curia, which in its current form is likewise a product of the 11th century, is the chief obstacle to any thorough reform of the Catholic Church, to any honest ecumenical understanding with the other Christian churches and world religions, and to any critical, constructive attitude toward the modern world.

Under the two most recent popes, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, there has been a fatal return to the church’s old monarchical habits.

In 2005, in one of Benedict’s few bold actions, he held an amicable four-hour conversation with me at his summer residence in Castel Gandolfo in Rome. I had been his colleague at the University of Tübingen and also his harshest critic. For 22 years, thanks to the revocation of my ecclesiastical teaching license for having criticized papal infallibility, we hadn’t had the slightest private contact.

Before the meeting, we decided to set aside our differences and discuss topics on which we might find agreement: the positive relationship between Christian faith and science, the dialogue among religions and civilizations, and the ethical consensus across faiths and ideologies.

For me, and indeed for the whole Catholic world, the meeting was a sign of hope. But sadly Benedict’s pontificate was marked by breakdowns and bad decisions. He irritated the Protestant churches, Jews, Muslims, the Indians of Latin America, women, reform-minded theologians and all pro-reform Catholics.

The major scandals during his papacy are known: there was Benedict’s recognition of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s arch-conservative Society of St. Pius X, which is bitterly opposed to the Second Vatican Council, as well as of a Holocaust denier, Bishop Richard Williamson.

There was the widespread sexual abuse of children and youths by clergymen, which the pope was largely responsible for covering up when he was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. And there was the “Vatileaks” affair, which revealed a horrendous amount of intrigue, power struggles, corruption and sexual lapses in the Curia, and which seems to be a main reason Benedict has decided to resign.

This first papal resignation in nearly 600 years makes clear the fundamental crisis that has long been looming over a coldly ossified church. And now the whole world is asking: might the next pope, despite everything, inaugurate a new spring for the Catholic Church?

There’s no way to ignore the church’s desperate needs. There is a catastrophic shortage of priests, in Europe and in Latin America and Africa. Huge numbers of people have left the church or gone into “internal emigration,” especially in the industrialized countries. There has been an unmistakable loss of respect for bishops and priests, alienation, particularly on the part of younger women, and a failure to integrate young people into the church.

  • 2 

NEXT PAGE »

Hans Küng is a professor emeritus of ecumenical theology at the University of Tübingen and the author of the forthcoming book “Can the Church Still Be Saved?” This essay was translated by Peter Heinegg from the German.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 1, 2013

An Op-Ed essay on Thursday about Benedict XVI’s legacy misstated the last time a pope resigned. It was nearly 600 years ago, not nearly 700.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

COMETS

Anyone visiting Huron Ridge on Rosseau will be immediately confronted by an over-sized amateur telescope and  a host of picture books containing  star maps. Yes, we all  love looking at the stars, which is easier to do here than in the bright and smoggy City.  Nothing however can compare to what can be seen over Conception Bay on a bright summer night, and yes, I know all about romantic memories. Not for nothing has mankind been fascinated by the stars, and not for nothing do we speculate about how they impact our daily lives. I am also someone who reads his daily horoscope, but  probably give it as much credibility as the utterances of the soft sell snake oil feel good preachers  like Joel Olsteen.  I have little tolerance for those  who manipulate the vulnerable, but I am nevertheless intrigued by them. Thankfully most of them enjoy comet like careers, they blaze brightly for but  a moment and then are seen no more. 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment